Hannah Davis
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • Personal Profile
    • Education
    • Professional Development
    • Contact
  • Teaching
    • Teaching
    • Teaching Philosophy
    • Higher Education
    • High School
    • Middle School
    • Other
  • Research
    • Research
    • Publications and Presentations
    • Certifications
  • Evaluation
    • Evaluation
  • Service
    • Service
    • Campus Service
    • Professional Service
    • Community Service
  • Blog

Making a change...the idealist takes a shot

11/26/2016

1 Comment

 
Picture

Holistic Approach to Faculty
or
An Idealist's Pipe Dream

This semester has brought a number of insights into the roles and expectations of faculty, the impact of change, and differences in education on an international level.  Add to that a number of personal observations drawn from interactions with those in my department, office, field, and others interested in the professoriate.  Throw in a number of personal challenges and an idea has begun to take shape in my mind.  We are seeing a move towards building a higher education experience that recognizes, supports, and develops the whole student.  It seems that a similar perspective should be taken with faculty.  
If higher education expects to develop students on a holistic level, perhaps it should take a similar approach with faculty.  My intention is not to enter higher education as a means to follow others on some well-worn path to tenure.  Certainly, I would love to be in a position to be eligible for tenure as a professor.  However, I have a desire to get there in my own way and on my personal merits.  I would love to sit down with a committee and work together to develop a plan of professional development that would lead me to tenure.  I don't think that path should necessarily be the counting of publications.  My primary goal in pursuing a career in higher education is not to add to the growing body of knowledge about educational psychology.  It is to have a positive impact on those interested in learning about the field.  Why is my passion for teaching, advising, working with undergraduate researchers, or developing presentations for conferences any less impactful than someone who is locked away in an office all day running stats and writing articles?  So you served on a couple of committees - great, but how did that involvement impact student learning, how did it improve your professional goals, how does it reflect your priorities in higher education?  

We aren't going to propel students into the 21st century ready to create the future if we aren't also willing to afford faculty a similar opportunity to grow and create an individual experience of the professoriate.  If we are going to continue the propagation of the term life-long learner, then let us truly honor that among our faculty as well as our student body.  Let's give faculty credit for participating in activities, projects, collaboratives, and anything else that contributes to their growth as a professional, an educator, a citizen, and a person.  We all have so much capacity for growth, but it is based in the skills we already possess and the ones we need to gain in order to continue reaching for our goals.  

As much as I hated the way teaching assessment tools were used in the K-12 system, I have to admit I think there is some merit to their use  - even in higher education.  Such tools allow for individuals to identify strengths and areas for growth.  They require educators to be forward thinking about their goals and to incorporate their interests (although I think this could be greatly expanded).  In the end, the assessment tools should be used to identify the growth of the individual.  Certainly, the tenure process could be amended by using a similar tool.  

In the end, the change I would like to see higher education make is to be attuned to the individual differences, strengths, limitations, skills, and goals of both its students and its professors.  I have sat in class with such a diverse group of my peers.  Our different backgrounds, experiences, abilities, and concerns have shaped our conversations both in class and in our blogs.  None of us conform to a single established template of what a "good student" should be, nor are we ever going to perfectly fit an unbending idea of what it means to be a "good professor."  We all have so much to give and much of that seems to go unnoticed or under appreciated because it doesn't conform to the existing model of what it means to be a faculty member.  Let those institutions who want to meet the needs of the student of tomorrow learn how to work with the faculty of tomorrow as well.  

1 Comment
resumesplanet link
6/4/2020 04:20:24 pm

Making a change or at least trying to change the norm is amazing. I believe that it is important that we innovate things, that is what I believe. If we are just doing the same old things over and over again, then there is nothing that is going to change. If we do not make things happen, then believe me, it will take a while before we can make things happen, but it should be fine. I just love the diea of it all.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    HpaethD

    Challenging myself and others to critically examine or creatively explore topics in higher education.  

    Archives

    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016

    Categories

    All
    Academic Integrity
    Future Of Higher Education
    Future Professoriate
    Higher Ed
    Higher Education
    Higher Education Institutions
    Inclusive Language
    Intellectual Freedom
    Mission Statements
    Pfpf15

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.